I've been using a Hall effect keyboard for quite a while, and I'm keenly aware that this switch technology is the most popular for gamers right now. However, a while ago I spoke with Razer product manager Dexter Tan about optical keyboards, and he argued that optical is actually better.
Both kinds of tech allow for analogue input, meaning keyboard switches don't just measure a binary 'off' or 'on', but instead can measure how far down each key has been pressed. This, of course, can allow for analogue input in racing games, for instance, but it also lets you use your keyboard in a more traditional 'pressed'/'not pressed' manner, but with more control over how far down each key gets actuated.
Tan explains: "Magnets are a little bit volatile, they're hard to control" which leads to "variations and deviations" in consistency between different Hall effect switches.
Optical switches, on the other hand, are apparently easier to keep consistent because you can precisely control the amount of light that goes through each switch. Essentially optical switches have cut-outs in them that change the amount of light that can pass through depending on how far down it's pressed.
In other words, it's the physical dimensions—the shape of the cut-out—which determines the precision with which the key depression can be measured. This, according to Razer, can be much more precise than getting the magnets in each switch to exhibit the same amount of magnetism, especially as the company says it tests and calibrates each switch right before yono business sbi packaging.
Razer's testing claims to show that this bears out in practice, with optical switches measuring the travel distance more accurately throughout the entire key press. You can see the straighter line in the graph belongs to the optical switch, rather than the Hall effect one.
Razer also claims optical switches are more reliable as they're less sensitive to environmental factors, and also more performant in general thanks to lower latency. But it's really the precision element that the company lays on heavy.
I suppose the main question I have is: how many players will notice the difference? I can only just about notice the benefit to Hall effect over standard mechanical, let alone any supposed difference between Hall effect and optical. But I'm not a young pro player with lightning-quick reactions. Razer admits that it's found that only some players can tell the difference between optical and non-optical keyboards.
The company also admits that optical switches require more power, which might be a problem for wireless keyboards. But wireless keyboards are quite niche anyway—most people are fine leaving their keyboard plugged in and stationary—so I suppose this isn't much of a downside. RGB lighting is still far more of an energy hog than the infrared in optical switches is.
At any rate, this precision difference might be something to look into if yono business you're one of the few ultra-competitive gamers looking to eke out as much performance as possible. I'm not sure how we'd test it, as end-users, though, beyond simple feel. On that front, my ageing fingers are happy either way, with Hall effect or optical or rummy meet heck, even just plain old mechanical.
Plus, there are new switch technologies emerging, such as TMR and induction. On the former, Tan says this still suffers some of the same limitations as Hall effect because it's magnetic, but with induction it's too early to tell and there's not enough data. Some other companies are , though, and if that's anything to go by then the optical vs Hall effect debate might be redundant in the end.
👉👈
1. Best overall:
2. Best budget:
3. Best mid-range:
4. Best rapid trigger:
5. Best wireless rapid trigger:
6. Best silent:
7. Best tenkeyless:
8. Best low profile:
9. Best ergonomic:
10. Best membrane: